Technical comparison: MP vs. MM vs. MC vs. MI

Technical comparison: MP vs. MM vs. MC vs. MI

Comparison of Pickup Types

FeatureMP (Moving Permalloy)MM (Moving Magnet)MC (Moving Coil)MI (Moving Iron)
Moving PartSoft Permalloy MagnetMagnetCoilSoft Iron (similar to Permalloy)
Fixed PartsCoils + MagnetsCoilsMagnetsCoils + Magnets
Output VoltageMedium to HighHighLow (Low Output) or Medium (High Output)Medium
Stylus ReplacementYes, easyYes, easyUsually not possible by yourselfYes, depending System
Mechanical InertiaLowMediumVery lowLow
ConstructionLike MI, but with PermalloySimplerMore complexSimilar to MP

Sound differences

Subjective assessment, depending on model, stylus quality, system setup, listining room and ears

MP (Moving Permalloy)

e.g. Nagaoka MP-200 bis MP-700

  • Sound: Warm, organic, detailed, but never annoying
  • Stage: Wide with pleasant depth
  • Bass: Tight, contoured, not overemphasized
  • Treble: Silky, never sharp or harsh
  • Suitable for: Long listening sessions, jazz, classical, vocals, acoustic music

MM (Moving Magnet)

e.g. Ortofon 2M Blue, AT VM95ML

  • Sound: Clear, direct, lively
  • Stage: Precise, but tends to be less Deep
  • Bass: More pronounced, sometimes more powerful but less differentiated
  • Treble: Lively to slightly metallic, depending on the model
  • Suitable for: Pop, rock, electronic, all-round use

MC (Moving Coil)

e.g. Ortofon Quintet, Denon DL-103, Audio-Technica OC9)

  • Sound: Very detailed, open, with high dynamics
  • Stage: Generous and deep
  • Bass: Very precise and controlled
  • Treble: Finely resolved, sometimes analytical
  • Suitable for: High-end listeners, Classical, jazz, demanding recordings

MI (Moving Iron)

e.g. Soundsmith SMMC, Goldring 2000-Serie)

  • Sound: Similar to MP, often slightly softer and rounder
  • Stage: Natural, not exaggerated
  • Bass: Rich, but not exaggerated
  • Treble: Mild, tends to be restrained
  • Suitable for: Vocal music, blues, older recordings